|
Ask The Dust
by Chris
Luckily I've never read John Fante's original novel of Ask the Dust, so unlike my last review, you will be spared tedious background details about the writer. This film version is directed by Robert Towne,
a screenwriter made famous by his Chinatown script back in 1974. He's
also known for writing Days of Thunder and the first two Mission:
Impossible films - safe to say he's made a few questionable choices
during his career. There's no mystery about what drew Towne to John
Fante's novel. The book is set in Los Angeles at around the same
period depicted in Chinatown, and it evokes the memory of a city in
which innocence and corruption sit side by side. It's a version of LA
that is often described as neo-noir, partly due to its sunny,
village-like feel, before the place became lost under a sprawl of
freeways. The racial and class tensions touched on in Chinatown, and
in this film, are brewing under the surface, but they're a long way
from boiling over. LA is, as Towne has pointed out, a city in its "adolescence".
It's LA in the 1930s. Arturo Bandini (Colin Farrell) is living in
poverty in a flea-bitten hotel, dreaming of becoming a great writer.
He frequently hands out copies of American Mercury, a literary
magazine edited by the journalist H.L. Mencken, in which one of his
short stories has been published. With his last nickel, he orders a
coffee at a café - where he notices a Mexican waitress, Camilla (Salma
Hayek). He is attracted to her but also antagonistic. He taunts her
about how bad the coffee is and she reacts angrily. Arturo throws a
string of verbal insults at her, saying Mexicans should only be
regarded with disdain (even when he refuses to confront his own
humiliation as an Italian-American).
Gradually in the weeks that follow, the friction between them fades,
and Arturo becomes involved with Camilla - seeing in her the
inspiration he's been lacking. However, he is resentful of her
relationship with Sammy (Justin Kirk), a seedy and violent barman who
pays her wages. H.L. Mencken begins contacting Arturo at his hotel,
mailing him money in return for his stories. Eventually, Mencken mails
the young writer a cheque with a letter asking him to write a
full-length novel. It dawns on Arturo that he might have finally found
his path to fame.
If that synopsis sounds a bit disjointed, then its only because events
are told from Arturo Bandini's meandering point of view. His story is
impressionistic, confessional and very much short on narrative drive –
much like the film itself. The city is seen through the awed eyes of
Bandini, who romanticises his own hardships. He is a deeply
contradictory character – cruel, narcissistic, but also strangely
naive ("an inexperienced jerk", as he says in his voiceover). He is
also a man prone to moments of lyricism. As previously mentioned, I've
never read Fante's book, but apparently it was autobiographical about
his struggles to become a great novelist. If that's true, then
Bandini, like Fante, is trying to find a balance between experiencing
life and writing about it. This is the central problem the film
struggles to overcome. Unlike Chinatown, Ask the Dust is not
plot-driven.
In the early part of the film, Robert Towne stays faithful to the film
noirs he must have grown up watching. Using voiceovers, flashbacks and
careful editing, he tries to capture Bandini in his full perversity.
He shows Bandini surviving on a diet of cheap oranges and worshipping his photo of writer
H.L. Mencken. Bandini fully lives up to the stereotype of the
self-destructive artist. Unfortunately, Colin Farrell makes his
erratic behaviour seem like the antics of a loveable rogue. Even when
he is down to his last nickel, there is no real sense of poverty or
desperation. It's all far too safe and artificial. The script really
called for an actor who could convincingly project Bandini's
conflicting thoughts as a writer (John Turturro did this brilliantly
in Barton Fink). I just couldn't get past Farrell's boyish image -
it's a million miles away from the hard-bitten and desperate image the
character deserves.
The first half of Ask the Dust is by far the strongest. In a voiceover, Bandini freely admits he has little
knowledge of women. He both desires Camilla and is terrified of her.
The film is at its most effective when it's showing the
misunderstandings between the couple. There are some uncomfortable
moments in which they taunt and humiliate one another. Both are
outsiders - she as a Mexican who can't read English, he as an
Italian-American. Adding to the tension between them is sleazy barman
Sammy, who always seems to be looking at them, and whose relationship
with Camilla confuses and worries Bandini (is it based on sex, drugs
or money?). It's also during this half where a strange Jewish woman,
named Vera Rivkin, stalks Bandini. At first glance, she seems like a
hardboiled femme fatale from a noir thriller, but she is soon revealed
as someone lost and vulnerable. There are some eerie and unsettling
scenes in which she strips for the young writer and shows him her
scarred skin (the reason behind them is never explained). You're never
quite sure if she is a real person or somebody Bandini is writing
about in his stories.
Much of this edge is lost in the latter part of the film. Rather than
exploring Bandini's twisted psyche, Robert Towne chooses to focus on
his love affair with Camilla. The storytelling becomes ever more
linear, ever more conventional, and ends up unbearably sentimental.
The staple Hollywood clichés begin with Bandini using the money from
his editor to take a holiday with Camilla. They rent a house by the
beach. They buy a dog. For a while, they have an idyllic time basking
in the sun. Bandini teaches Camilla to read English, and mentors her
on American history in order for her to win US citizenship. He
continues to work on his novel, and so on. You can't help but feel
disappointed during these moments of the film, and when some rather
nauseating melodrama creeps into the final scenes you begin to wonder
if Robert Towne simply got bored of the story. By the end, the rawness
and intensity that are promised early on clearly aren't there.
There is little to say about Salma Hayek as Camilla. She is feisty and
sexy in the role, but not any different to similar performances in her
past films. Once again she capitalizes on her smouldering looks,
rather than act with any determined effort - including removing her
clothes on two occasions. I'm guessing her contract states that nude
scenes are compulsory. Her scenes with Farrell are fine, especially in
the opening scenes when they first encounter one another at the café.
Donald Sutherland also appears in a tiny role as Hellfrick, the
hotel's token drunk, who unfortunately isn't given very much
screentime. Some of you may be astute enough to recognize the voice of
H.L. Mencken belonging to that of film critic Richard Schickel.
Visually, Ask the Dust is a great homage to the noir genre. On
what must have been a modest budget compared to other films of this
type, Towne and his production team do an amazing job in recreating
1930s LA. The locations and costumes are glossy and period perfect.
Even impoverished writers like Bandini dress like Sam Spade, and the
streets are full of beautiful but unobtainable women. The film was
actually shot in Cape Town, South Africa – using huge sets built by
production designer Dennis Gassner. They impressively evoke the
ramshackle charm of the city, in particular Bunker Hill where the
characters are mostly seen. Together with Caleb Deschanel's rich, dark
cinematography, Ask the Dust is at least successful in the art
department.
I'm afraid Robert Towne is only to blame for the films
problems and the matter of it falling apart in the last act. Towne's
examination of the racial and class tensions between the two main
characters cover familiar ground, but he never makes it bold enough to
have any effect. Statements about the irony of their relationship, and
the myth of California as a land of equality and opportunity, are
handled pretty badly. Despite the admittedly gorgeous cinematography
and superb production design, it lacks the energy, passion, and
dramatic weight needed to make it worthwhile. Put it this way, its no
Chinatown.
|