|
Blood Diamond
Message movies always seem to work better when they're served with
healthy doses of excitement and/or humor. As the saying goes, "A
spoonful of sugar helps the medicine go down". With Blood Diamond you get a steady supply of action inter-cut with the moralizing.
Director Edward Zwick is no stranger to war movies, and he's certainly
got the action down to a science at this point, but the message didn't
quite resonate for me as much as one imagines they intended.
I wouldn't go so far as to say that the message gets lost among the
explosions (it's definitely there), but it just didn't really stick
with me after I left the theater the way last year's The Constant
Gardener did. Both films focus on the exploitation of African people
at the hands of Western industry. In many ways the actions and
motivations of the diamond companies in Blood Diamond are more
reprehensible than Gardener's pharmaceutical companies, while the
violence is much more intense, so I'm not sure why the whole thing
fell short for me. Perhaps it's because I didn't have any
diamond-blood on my hands. I don't own any diamonds and I have never
bought one (Ladies, form an orderly queue), so I felt no personal
guilt. Or perhaps PR for the real diamond companies has managed a
successful damage control to lessen the film's impact. The entire
diamond industry has been in a state of panic about the impending
release, doing everything they can to get the word out that things
have changed quite a bit since the 1999 events of the film (Supposedly
the percentage of conflict diamonds sold in the international market
is down from 15% to about 1 or 2%). After seeing the finished product
though, I don't think they have much to worry about.

The film opens rather peacefully in Sierra Leone showing us Solomon
Vandy (Djimon Hounsou) and his family. The mood quickly shifts
however when the violent Revolutionary United Front (R.U.F.) invades
the village and kidnaps Solomon along with others, after shooting
enough people to let them know how serious they are. One thing I was
very impressed with was how jarring the descent into chaos is. They
say there's always a calm before the storm, but it's quite amazing
watching the swift escalation depicted here. One gets a clear idea of
the fear people must constantly live with in that region. Solomon is
taken to work in a diamond-mining field, where he finds an immense
pink diamond minutes before the entire crew is arrested. While
imprisoned he encounters diamond smuggler, Danny Archer (Leonardo
DiCaprio) who immediately sees an opportunity to make a fortune.
Danny uses his own connections as well as American journalist, Maddy
Bowen's (Jennifer Connelly) to get Solomon released and reunited with
his family (short one son), and of course in return he expects Solomon
to unite him with that hidden diamond. Overall they've got a
compelling and believable plot set-up here, but there are some
complications along the way that come off as being a little forced.
For example Solomon's son working closely with his captors seems a
little too coincidental. It is possible this was a calculated move,
after all the man claims as much, but I took that as an empty threat
when he said it. Either way it just seems far-fetched. The eventual
reunion between father and son also comes at a time that leaves you
going "What are the chances of that?"
Despite my reservations, the film proves to be in capable hands with
Edward Zwick. I'm among the few who considers the filmmaker's last
attempt, The Last Samurai, to be an underappreciated gem. While Blood
Diamond didn't impress me as much as that film did, it certainly was
an enjoyable ride. The battle scenes are all very well executed,
particularly the air strike toward the end of the film, which stands
among the best action sequences of the year. It's not quite Black
Hawk Down, but it will do. Another touch I liked was the scene at the
bar with President Clinton talking about the Starr Investigations on
the television, as Maddy remarks, "All anyone in America cares about
is Blowjobgate". 1999 seems so recent and yet I don't remember much
at all regarding the conflict in Sierra Leone (I've since taken a
greater interest in world events), but the Clinton/Lewinsky scandal is
still fresh in my mind. I can't speak for everyone else, but I
thought this scene did an effective job of placing the events of the
film in context by saying "This is what you were paying attention to
while these things were happening."
The acting in the film is pretty solid all around, but I don't think
any of the performances in the film from the principle cast will go
down as the actors' signature performances (read: Don't expect any
Oscar nods). After the early trailers hit a lot of people were
giggling over Leo's accent (I know "In America it's bling bling but
out here it's bling bang" became a recurring catch phrase among my
friends). I figured it would sound better in context and for the most
part it does, but there are a couple times in the film where he seems
to invoke Jar Jar Binks. It's generally accepted that Leonardo
DiCaprio is one of his generation's best actors, and he does good work
here, but if you really want to see the man cut loose on a role, I'd
direct you toward The Departed instead. Similarly Jennifer Connelly
is solid as Maddy, but nothing she did in the film really struck me
the way she has in other films. I suppose it didn't help that I
didn't really like her character, the bleeding heart journalist who
wants to help except when she's given an opportunity to do so. Djimon
Hounsou is probably the most effective of the leads, but he seemed
underutilized to me. His is the primary conflict of the film, but
he's relegated to a supporting part while the two more recognizable
faces get most of the screen-time. It's pretty much a mixed bag all
around. If the subject matter interests you, check it out.
Otherwise, wait for the DVD.
|